Skip to content

STEPS Centre

Pathways to Sustainability
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Flickr
  • YouTube
  • SlideShare
  • RSS

Menu

  • Stories
    • Stories of Change
    • Reflections
    • Impact
  • Methods
  • Publications
    • Journal Articles
    • Briefings
    • Books
    • Working Papers
    • Other Publications
  • Research
    • All Projects
    • Climate Change & Energy
    • Food & Agriculture
    • Governance & Policy
    • Health & Disease
    • Pastoralism
    • Resource Politics
    • Technology & Innovation
    • Understanding Sustainability
    • Urbanisation
    • Water
  • Online course
  • Global Consortium
    • Africa
    • China
    • Europe
    • Latin America
    • North America
    • South Asia

How do we end the dominance of rich countries over sustainability science?

January 19th, 2016 Patrick Van Zwanenberg 1 Comment

by Patrick van Zwanenberg, Anabel Marin & Adrian Ely

With the new Sustainable Development Goals adopted by the UN last year, SciDev.Net has published a timely report on the global status of sustainability science.

Sustainability science (defined as ‘research that supports and drives sustainable development’) is growing significantly as a proportion of world scientific output, and is highly collaborative, as the report shows. But it is still – with the important exception of China – an endeavour dominated by rich countries.

High income countries produce three quarters of all research output on sustainability. Low-income countries account for only 2% of publications. Although the field is highly collaborative, most of that collaboration occurs between researchers based in high-income countries. Middle and especially low-income countries are far less involved, and there are very few South-South links.

The report found that, where developing country researchers are involved in collaborating with their colleagues in rich countries, those partnerships are hugely important, contributing a large proportion of developing countries research output on sustainability.

But as Luisa Massarani from SciDev.Net notes, a critical question the report raises – but does not address – is this: how much of this North-South collaborative work has followed the agendas and priorities of poor countries?

Bucking the trend

The minor role played by low and middle income countries in producing global sustainability research – and their even more limited opportunities to set research agendas and priorities – are almost certainly characteristic of all areas of science, technology and innovation.

But sustainability challenges, and future pathways, are highly dependent on context. They are also deeply contested. This makes the Northern bias of research agendas especially unfortunate.

Research from the South

Now, a new ‘Transformations to Sustainability Programme’ set up by the International Social Science Council – and a STEPS consortium project on ‘Transformative Pathways to Sustainability’ funded by it – is countering that undesirable trend.

ISSC’s ‘Transformations to Sustainability Programme’ aims to support research networks and activities that enable transformations to more sustainable and socially just societies. The programme, which called for multi-continent, multi-country research teams, required lead or co-lead applicants to be based in a low or middle-income country. It is also supporting a new way of doing research, one that is co-designed and co-produced, which means that all stakeholders and users are involved in a meaningful way in the research production process, including, crucially, the setting of priorities and framing of research questions.

Our project is co-led from Argentina, with STEPS partners from both low and middle income countries (Kenya, India, and China) and high income nations – Sweden, the USA and the UK. With initial seed funding, we ran workshops defining sustainability challenges and priorities with stakeholders in each country in the fields of urban water and waste in cities, low carbon energy transitions, and sustainable agricultural and food systems.

argwork
Workshop in Argentina on sustainable seed systems. Photo: STEPS America Latina

Methods and learning across borders

Our aim now will be to experiment with new methodological and institutional approaches to building pathways to sustainability across those different sectors, regions and cultures. We will be drawing on these experiments to aid mutual learning across settings. For example, researchers will carry out collaborative writing tasks, and we will run exchanges of early career researchers between our project regions.

We will also focus strongly on capacity building: through the STEPS Summer School, online resources that are under development, and the early career researcher exchanges, with support from more senior colleagues across high, low and middle-income countries.

Cosmas Ochieng, Executive Director of the African Centre for Technology Studies (another partner on the project who are focussing on low carbon transitions that serve the needs of the poor) said: “This is a truly exciting North-South, South-South, interdisciplinary and transformative collaborative research project and we look forward to cross-sectoral and cross-regional learning and exchange of knowledge and experiences on low carbon development pathways within the consortium”.

The ISSC project provides an amazing opportunity to develop the STEPS consortium’s ambitions for further South-South collaboration and to co-produce research on sustainability challenges that are defined by those most familiar with the contexts in question.

Read more

Transformative Pathways to Sustainability project

Blog, Latin America Hub, Research Methods, Understanding Sustainability
  • International Social Science Council (ISSC)
  • Pathways Network
  • Pathways to Sustainability
  • research
  • Sustainable development goals (SDGs)
  • Transformations to Sustainability Programme

Post navigation

Previous Post:

Four neglected challenges for China’s low carbon future

Next Post:

India’s seed sector is flourishing. Could African farmers benefit?

One comment:

  1. Pingback: BAPA+40: Learning from the Global South - Global Development Institute Blog

Comments are closed.

Recent blog posts

  • Challenging Research
  • How do researchers’ roles relate to the methods they work with?
  • Caring for and nurturing the soil – Umbela Conversatorio #4
  • Gathering knowledges – Umbela Conversatorio #3
  • Regulating technologies in diverse development contexts – looking back to look forward

Related blogs

RSS Pastoralism, Uncertainty & Resilience

  • Navigating through floods and droughts with dryland buffaloes and swimming camels 27th January 2023
  • The true role of ethnicity in Sahelian herder-farmer conflicts 20th January 2023
  • Approaching the capital: Nomadic pastoralist (im)mobilities in Mali 13th January 2023

RSS Zimbabweland

  • Negotiating ‘belonging’ in Zimbabwe’s land reform areas 30th January 2023
  • Preparing for the next pandemic: lessons from Zimbabwe 16th January 2023
  • Why livestock keeping can be good for the environment 9th January 2023

Main Pages

  • Home
  • About us
  • Conferences
  • Annual Lectures
  • Blog archive
  • Copyright
  • Accessibility
  • Terms

About Us

Between 2006 and 2021, the STEPS Centre carried out global research and policy engagement funded by the Economic & Social Research Council (ESRC), bringing together development studies and science & technology studies.

Address:
The Institute of Development Studies,
Library Road,
Falmer
BN1 9RE, UK

Email: [email protected]

ESRC University of Sussex Institute of Development Studies
All content © STEPS Centre 2011 - 2023